Re-Consider: The Integration of Online Dispute Resolution and Decision Support Systems
نویسندگان
چکیده
Current approaches for the design of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) systems involve the replication of Alternative Dispute Resolution practices such as mediation and negotiation. Though such systems have been found to be popular, there are concerns that these systems fail to take into account judicial practices. In this paper a system that supports disputants' decisions making when engaged in an online dispute is advanced. The system, Re-Consider, is an Australia Family Law ODR system, that is based on judicial reasoning modelled with Bayesian belief networks and provides disputants with decision support in the dispute. It is believed that this approach provides disputants with an online resolution process that will help them to reach outcomes that take judicial practices into account and presents a step toward more deliberative form of online dispute resolution.
منابع مشابه
Online Dispute Resolution-The Emperor's New Clothes? Benefits and Pitfalls of Online Dispute Resolution and its Application to Commercial Arbitration
The question this paper addresses is how can IT support the resolution of disputes through arbitration and mediation. The first and second parts will examine the benefits of Online Dispute Resolution, some of the pitfalls it may present and how these can be avoided. The third part will then look at one of the more formidable obstaclesthe issue of security of communications. The fourth part will...
متن کاملAn Argument Structure Abstraction for Bayesian Belief Networks: Just Outcomes in On-line Dispute Resolution
There are many different approaches for settling disputes on-line, such as simple email systems, fixed bid systems and intelligent systems. However, to date there have been no attempts to integrate decision support methods into the dispute resolution process for the purpose of supporting outcomes that are consistent with judicial reasoning. This paper describes how a model of judicial reasoning...
متن کاملIncreasing Media Richness in Online Dispute Resolution and the Need for Personal Data Protection
This contribution introduces a new approach to online dispute resolution (ODR) and provides a portrayal of the performativity that Ambient Intelligence systems seem to convey to ODR: substantial enrichness and levels of support to the decision-making process with the provision of meaningful context information. We will portray the main issues and concerns addressed to Ambient Intelligence and w...
متن کاملاصل محرمانه بودن در شیوههای جایگزین حل اختلاف
In contrast with general principle of open legal proceedings in governmental courts we have a general rule governing on arbitration and other alternative dispute resolution like negotiation, arbitration, mediation, privacy & confidentiality proceedings. In other words, in this method third parties except for parties of dispute are not authorized to be present and observe parties disputes. F...
متن کاملManaging Negotiation Knowledge with the Goal of developing Negotiation Decision Support Systems
While Information Technology has been used to support negotiation there is little research in the domain of knowledge management in legal negotiation. In this paper we discuss the nature of negotiation knowledge and how such knowledge can be utilized to construct negotiation decision support systems. We conduct an in-depth examination of the notion of a BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated A...
متن کامل